Bandarkuna GP Eraligool Binodini Safala Moinahala villages

Bandarkuna GP Eraligool Dispute & High Court 2025 Historical Struggle & High Court Order

An order has already been received from the High Court to give land titles to the landless people of several villages including Eraligul, Binodini, Safala, Mainala of Bandarkona GP in South Karimganj center! But a person named Dhiraj Bhattacharya of the Hindu Rakshi Dal of Sribhumi Karimganj has given a written complaint to the Nilambazar Circle Office. In which it is mentioned that the people of a particular community in this area should not be given land titles. In that regard, a big meeting was held today in Eraligul Timuka, under the leadership of former president of Patharkandi regional panchayat Abdul Chattar. They took various decisions in it. The details were given in the media.

Bandarkuna GP Eraligool Binodini Safala Moinahala villages For decades, the residents of Eraligool, Binodini, Safala, and Moinahala villages in South Karimganj have been struggling to secure their land rights. These villages, part of the Bandarkuna Gaon Panchayat under Karimganj district, Assam, were officially marked as “landless” settlements despite villagers holding old purchase deeds and ancestral documents proving ownership.

Generations of families have tilled the soil, built homes, and contributed to the local economy, yet administrative delays and bureaucratic hurdles prevented them from receiving official land pattas (leases). Frustrated by this injustice, villagers filed repeated petitions to the Nilambazar Circle Office, district authorities, and eventually to the Guwahati High Court.

According to a report published on Lafznews, the High Court issued a landmark directive, ordering that pattas be granted to families in Bandarkuna GP who had been wrongfully denied their rights. This move was hailed as a “historic victory” for the marginalized communities of South Karimganj.

The Lafznews article highlights that nearly 300 families have benefitted from this judgment, with more awaiting official allotments. Social media references, including posts by community leaders such as Monjur Ahmed’s profile and his timeline updates, also confirm ongoing local movements and documentation of pattas being distributed.

Residents argue that they legally purchased the land decades ago—some from Hindu families who migrated elsewhere, others directly from ancestral owners. Despite holding proof, they had to fight for more than 70 years in court, labeled as “encroachers” or “landless squatters.”

The High Court’s order not only grants justice but also restores dignity to these communities. Villagers celebrated the verdict in Eraligool and Binodini, stating that “this is not just about land—it is about recognition of our history and rights.”

The judgment has also set a precedent for other landless communities across Assam, signaling that legal persistence and unity can overcome systemic neglect. However, the victory was soon followed by new challenges, as certain political and social groups began raising objections.

Allegations, Local Backlash & Demand for Inquiry

While the High Court ruling offered relief, controversy erupted when Dhiraj Bhattacharjee, reportedly associated with a group from Shreebhumi, Karimganj, lodged a complaint at the Nilambazar Circle Office. He alleged that Eraligool and Binodini villagers, particularly from the Muslim community, had encroached on lands after 1971 by displacing Hindu families.

Local leaders and residents have strongly condemned these claims. At a massive public meeting held in Eraligool Timukai, under the leadership of former Panchayat president Abdul Chattar, community members declared the allegations false, baseless, and politically motivated.

Key voices:

Monjur Ahmed, current Bandarkuna GP member, criticized the complaint, saying it aims to “divide the community along religious lines.”
Nishit Ranjan, another Panchayat leader, stated that Bhattacharjee’s allegations are “completely fabricated to block pattas distribution.”
Abdul Hamid, representing former GP vice-president, also denounced the complaint, emphasizing the unity of Hindu and Muslim residents who have coexisted peacefully for 70+ years.

According to locals, Hindu and Muslim families have shared these villages for generations without communal strife. “If Hindus were displaced after 1971, as claimed, where is the evidence?” asked residents at the meeting. They demanded that the District Commissioner (DC), Deputy Superintendent of Police (DSP), and the Assam government question Bhattacharjee to provide proof.

Villagers warned that if he fails to substantiate his allegations, they would pursue defamation proceedings against him. They also called for a government inquiry committee to investigate the truth and prevent such misleading narratives from disturbing communal harmony.

The protests have drawn attention not only at the local level but also on social media. Multiple hashtags such as #silcharnews, #LocalNews, and #purbanchalpratidin circulated widely, amplifying the villagers’ perspective. The Facebook references you shared also indicate a strong grassroots campaign against misinformation.

Despite the allegations, the villagers remain hopeful. They see the High Court order as a recognition of justice and are determined to ensure its implementation. Their demands are clear:

Distribute pattas to all eligible families without delay.
Hold accountable those spreading false allegations.
Form a neutral inquiry committee to safeguard community rights.

In conclusion, the Bandarkuna GP land dispute represents both the long fight for rightful ownership and the ongoing battle against false narratives. While the High Court has offered relief, the community continues to push for truth, dignity, and unity in the face of divisive tactics.