Student Protest Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Adarsha Mahavidyalaya, Cheragibazar, South Karimganj Against College Mismanagement
Student protests of Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Adarsha Mahavidyalaya in Cheragibazar, South Karimganj, Assam, have taken to the streets in a bold protest against widespread administrative negligence and the dismal condition of their government college. Despite being a state-funded institution, students report severe infrastructural deficits, including broken bathroom doors, unclean and non-functional drinking water facilities, and insufficient fans in classrooms. Even with basic necessities lacking, students face constant academic challenges. Teachers are often absent, student union elections have not been conducted, and cultural programs remain canceled despite allocated government funds. This glaring mismanagement has forced students to raise their voices publicly, blocking the Assam-Tripura national highway to demand attention and immediate action.
The principal, Joyashree Chakraborty, has reportedly failed to address these grievances. Instead, students allege that she threatens to fail or expel anyone who questions the administration, creating a climate of fear. Controversially, in the presence of police, five student leaders who attempted to mediate the protest were summoned and warned, intensifying anger among students. This oppressive approach highlights a systemic problem in governance where accountability is absent, and student welfare is compromised.
The protest underlines the urgent need for proper infrastructure, sufficient academic staff, and transparent administrative practices. Students argue that without their active involvement and collective voice, the college’s conditions will continue to deteriorate. They have documented unhealthy drinking water conditions, non-functional fans, unsafe classrooms, and unclean toilets, emphasizing that these basic issues directly affect their health and academic performance.
In addition to infrastructure and academic grievances, students demand proper conduct of student elections and cultural programs to foster holistic development. These protests are not merely about immediate inconveniences but about the broader neglect of student rights and educational standards in government institutions. The situation at Pandit Deendayal College serves as a reflection of how administrative apathy can hinder the growth and future prospects of young learners. By raising their voices, students are not only protesting poor conditions but are also calling for accountability, equity, and reform in government-run colleges
Student protest Demonstrations at Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Adarsha Mahavidyalaya in Cheragibazar Over Administrative Negligence
The ongoing student protest at Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Adarsha Mahavidyalaya sheds light on the severe infrastructural crisis in the government college. The campus, meant to facilitate quality education, is plagued with broken bathroom doors, inadequate water supply, unclean drinking water, and non-functional fans. Students report that bathrooms often lack water containers, faucets, and even doors, making privacy impossible. With classrooms lacking even basic ceiling fans, studying in scorching heat has become unbearable. Additionally, the college’s generator is inoperative, compounding the difficulties during power cuts. The absence of a functional canteen and the lack of safety measures for female students further underline systemic neglect.
Students claim that despite repeatedly reporting these issues to the administration, no effective solutions have been implemented. The principal, Joyashree Chakraborty, is rarely present on campus, and when students raise concerns, they are often threatened with suspension or failure. Such punitive measures have created an atmosphere of fear, discouraging students from speaking up about genuine problems. Videos have emerged showing student leaders being warned in the presence of police while attempting to de-escalate the protest, raising serious concerns about the misuse of authority to suppress dissent.
The infrastructural shortcomings extend beyond bathrooms and classrooms. Drinking water facilities are unhygienic, exposing students to potential health hazards. The gym and other recreational facilities, though existing on paper, remain inaccessible. These issues not only hamper daily learning but also affect students’ mental and physical well-being. The protest highlights the broader concern of student safety, as the lack of proper maintenance in campus infrastructure can lead to accidents and health issues.
Moreover, cultural programs and student union elections, crucial for holistic development and leadership training, are consistently canceled or ignored, despite the availability of funds. The absence of these activities reflects a lack of commitment to fostering student growth and civic engagement. Students emphasize that raising their voices is the only way to demand accountability and improvements in a system that continues to ignore basic needs. Their activism represents not just a fight for infrastructure but for respect, safety, and a quality educational environment.
Purvanchal Pratidin
Poor Infrastructure Sparks Student Anger at Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Adarsha Mahavidyalaya, Cheragibazar
Student protests at Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Adarsha Mahavidyalaya are deeply rooted in severe academic disruptions caused by administrative apathy. Students highlight that many faculty positions remain vacant, leaving a single teacher to manage multiple subjects and semesters, often combining first, third, and fifth-semester classes. This overburdening severely compromises the quality of education, as students are unable to cover the curriculum effectively. Academic negligence is compounded by the absence of student union elections and cancellation of cultural events, depriving learners of leadership opportunities and holistic development.
Despite repeated requests and submissions of memorandums, the administration, led by principal Joyashree Chakraborty, has failed to address the grievances. Students allege that raising complaints results in threats of suspension or poor academic evaluation, creating a hostile environment. In a shocking display of power misuse, student leaders attempting to manage protest activities were summoned to the principal’s office and warned in the presence of police. This approach has only escalated tensions, emphasizing how administrative indifference undermines student rights and educational integrity.
The lack of teaching staff directly affects students’ learning outcomes. Political Science students, for example, report that only one faculty member handles multiple courses, making it impossible to conduct practical or theoretical sessions effectively. Without proper guidance, students struggle to complete their syllabus, and academic performance is compromised. Cultural programs, funded by the government, remain unorganized, limiting student exposure to extracurricular skills that are essential for confidence and career development.
These academic disruptions highlight a broader systemic issue in government colleges, where infrastructure and governance failures intersect to hinder student growth. By taking to the streets, students aim to draw public attention to these issues and demand urgent intervention. Their protests signify not only a fight against poor educational conditions but also a call for transparency, accountability, and a functional academic environment. Without student activism, these longstanding issues would likely persist unchecked, negatively impacting the future of countless learners PURVANCHAL PRATIDIN
Academic Chaos and Principal’s Negligence Trigger Student Movement at Cheragibazar College
The recent protests at Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Adarsha Mahavidyalaya demonstrate the vital role of student activism in holding government institutions accountable. When basic infrastructure, safety, and academic standards are neglected, it falls upon students to voice their concerns and demand change. The widespread protest, which included blocking the Assam-Tripura national highway, reflects the frustration of hundreds of students over broken bathroom doors, non-functional fans, unhygienic drinking water, absence of teachers, and canceled cultural programs. These demonstrations are a direct response to the principal’s repeated threats and administrative negligence, highlighting the necessity of public action when governance fails.
Students argue that if they remain silent, there will be no improvement in the college’s deplorable conditions. The principal, Joyashree Chakraborty, reportedly discourages complaints and threatens punitive action, undermining students’ confidence and rights. Videos showing student leaders being warned in the presence of police underscore the misuse of authority to suppress dissent. By raising their voices collectively, students not only demand immediate resolution of infrastructure and academic issues but also advocate for long-term accountability in government-run institutions.
Beyond immediate grievances, the protests emphasize the broader societal responsibility to support student welfare. Government colleges, intended to provide accessible education, must ensure that facilities, academic staff, and extracurricular opportunities meet minimum standards. Students’ demands for clean drinking water, functional classrooms, properly maintained bathrooms, and active student unions are not mere requests but essential prerequisites for equitable and effective learning. Additionally, the restoration of cultural programs and leadership opportunities is crucial for holistic development and community engagement.
This movement exemplifies how students can challenge systemic apathy and inspire reform. It sends a clear message: education is a right, not a privilege, and neglect cannot be tolerated. Student activism, in this context, becomes a tool for social accountability, pressuring administrators and the government to act responsibly. By protesting peacefully yet firmly, the learners of Pandit Deendayal College are not only protecting their present academic environment but also safeguarding the future of all students who will pass through government institutions. Their collective voice is a testament to the power of organized action against injustice and the urgent need for comprehensive reforms
People Also Ask (PAA) Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Adarsha Mahavidyalaya on 27th August
Why did students protest on 27 August?
Students protested on 27 August to demand better education facilities, timely scholarships, and action against administrative negligence.
What was the main reason for the Student Protest on 27 August?
The main reason for the Student Protest was dissatisfaction with government policies, lack of infrastructure, and unresolved student grievances.
Where did the 27 August Student Protest take place?
The Student Protest on 27 August took place in multiple districts and college campuses, gathering huge participation from youth.
What are the demands of students in the 27 August protest?
Students demanded scholarship distribution, quality education, hostel facilities, and justice for pending issues during the protest.
students protest at Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Adarsha Mahavidyalaya on 27th August?
Students protested on 27th August because of poor facilities including no water in bathrooms, broken bathroom doors, lack of ladies’ facilities, and mismanagement by college authorities.
What were the key issues that triggered the Student Protest at Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay College?
The protest was triggered by unhygienic bathrooms, shortage of drinking water, no proper space, poor infrastructure, and neglect by the principal.
Where did the 27th August Student Protest take place?
The student protest took place at the college gate and inside the college ground of Pandit Deendayal Upadhyay Adarsha Mahavidyalaya, Cheragibazar.
How did the college principal react during the student protest?
During the protest, the principal threatened students with expulsion, accusing them of “instigating others.” A video of this went viral in front of the police.
Was the police present during the Student Protest at Cheragibazar College?
Yes, police arrived during the 27th August protest and were present when the student leaders were called into the principal’s office.
What issues led to the Student Protest 2025 on 27 August?
The Student Protest 2025 on 27 August was triggered by delayed scholarships, poor hostel conditions, and lack of government response.
Did the government respond to the 27 August Student Protest?
No. Students said they had already raised these issues to the college president and management earlier, but no action was taken, forcing them to protest.
How long has student dissatisfaction been building at the college?
Students said they have been raising concerns for months, but because management ignored them, frustration peaked on 27th August.
What were the reactions after the viral protest video?
The viral video caused public outrage, as it showed how students were threatened instead of their problems being solved.
Are more student protests expected at Pandit Deendayal College?
Yes. Student leaders have warned that if demands for basic facilities are not met, the movement will continue inside the college.
What is the significance of the 27th August Student Protest at Cheragibazar?
The protest symbolizes student unity against mismanagement, demanding dignity, safe infrastructure, and accountability from the administration.
Pingback: Police Brutality NCC Students Injured Arrested in Badarpur